tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233128.post5598808152442083818..comments2023-09-15T04:48:09.396-07:00Comments on pyx: Eventlet 0.7 and Spawning 0.7 ReleasedDonovan Prestonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07076057843365973055noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233128.post-12379469243869786922008-09-02T03:02:20.000-07:002008-09-02T03:02:20.000-07:00@Oscar Carlsson: Thanks for the praise, and thanks...@Oscar Carlsson: Thanks for the praise, and thanks for trying out Spawning!<br>@nuggien: It should be pretty easy to find some WSGI middleware that does Virtual Hosting. Basically, it would look at the Host: header and choose which WSGI application to send the request to. There's nothing in Spawning for doing this out of the box, but it's a good candidate for addition since virtual hosting is such a common use case. I'll think about it and see if there's an easy way to add it that makes sense.<br>Donovan Prestonhttp://ulaluma.com/pyxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233128.post-28252605148701409062008-07-31T03:05:44.000-07:002008-07-31T03:05:44.000-07:00Is it possible to run multiple django sites under ...Is it possible to run multiple django sites under one instance of spawning? Kind of like apache's virtual hosts mechanism?<br>nuggiennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3233128.post-89451314364545123432008-07-31T00:52:30.000-07:002008-07-31T00:52:30.000-07:00I've been trying out Spawning some today - and...I've been trying out Spawning some today - and it totally kicks ass!<br>It's so fast it's silly! Although it uses a little bit more RAM than apache with mod_wsgi, it seems to be a lot more resource efficient.<br>Thanks for this app! :-)<br>Oscar Carlssonnoreply@blogger.com